<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synchronizing Transfer ORM in a Model-Glue/Coldspring cluster with TransferSync</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/10/16/synchronizing-transfer-orm-in-a-model-gluecoldspring-cluster-with-transfersync/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/10/16/synchronizing-transfer-orm-in-a-model-gluecoldspring-cluster-with-transfersync</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TransferSync stable on ActiveMQ 5.2.0 &#187; ghidinelli.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/10/16/synchronizing-transfer-orm-in-a-model-gluecoldspring-cluster-with-transfersync/comment-page-1#comment-53815</link>
		<dc:creator>TransferSync stable on ActiveMQ 5.2.0 &#187; ghidinelli.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/?p=217#comment-53815</guid>
		<description>[...] my post on synchronizing Transfer ORM with TransferSync, I used Apache ActiveMQ 5.1.0 which was not reliable for me. After about a week of uptime, one of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my post on synchronizing Transfer ORM with TransferSync, I used Apache ActiveMQ 5.1.0 which was not reliable for me. After about a week of uptime, one of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/10/16/synchronizing-transfer-orm-in-a-model-gluecoldspring-cluster-with-transfersync/comment-page-1#comment-51759</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/?p=217#comment-51759</guid>
		<description>A note about dev/staging servers.  In our network we have a separate server for staging and we do NOT want this machine to be part of the ActiveMQ cluster.  In short, changes made on the test server should not cause the production machines to discard their objects.  

Assuming you don&#039;t add the IPTABLES rules listed above, you will get error messages from the other nodes like:

&lt;code&gt;
INFO  DiscoveryNetworkConnector      - Establishing network connection between from vm://localhost to tcp://web1:61616
WARN  DiscoveryNetworkConnector      - Could not start network bridge between: vm://localhost and: tcp://web1:61616 due to: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
INFO  DemandForwardingBridge         - localhost bridge to Unknown stopped
&lt;/code&gt;

You can eliminate these by adding one simple rule on the box you wish to exclude:

&lt;code&gt;-A OUTPUT -p udp -d 239.255.2.3 --dport 6155 -j DROP&lt;/code&gt;

This will stop the machine from broadcasting UDP packets that tell other machines &quot;hey, connect to me!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note about dev/staging servers.  In our network we have a separate server for staging and we do NOT want this machine to be part of the ActiveMQ cluster.  In short, changes made on the test server should not cause the production machines to discard their objects.  </p>
<p>Assuming you don&#8217;t add the IPTABLES rules listed above, you will get error messages from the other nodes like:</p>
<p><code><br />
INFO  DiscoveryNetworkConnector      - Establishing network connection between from vm://localhost to tcp://web1:61616<br />
WARN  DiscoveryNetworkConnector      - Could not start network bridge between: vm://localhost and: tcp://web1:61616 due to: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host<br />
INFO  DemandForwardingBridge         - localhost bridge to Unknown stopped<br />
</code></p>
<p>You can eliminate these by adding one simple rule on the box you wish to exclude:</p>
<p><code>-A OUTPUT -p udp -d 239.255.2.3 --dport 6155 -j DROP</code></p>
<p>This will stop the machine from broadcasting UDP packets that tell other machines &#8220;hey, connect to me!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
