<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Geocoded Zip Code Databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-39433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jupiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-39433</guid>
		<description>I have found errors in the db that you used from ziplist.com

Try 89183 which is a new zip in Las Vegas. I used Google Earth to see exactly where the coordinates where it was telling me. They were about 10 miles off from where mapquest locates it to be.

I have searched many sites, and most give me the same coordinates as ziplist. The only ones who have gotten it right so far are the mapping websites (mapquest, maps.yahoo, etc) and www.xionetic.com, but theirs isn&#039;t a database but instead a software package.

After many hours of research, I found this blog and thought I would let you know not to completely trust the mentioned db, before continuing my search for a truly correct list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found errors in the db that you used from ziplist.com</p>
<p>Try 89183 which is a new zip in Las Vegas. I used Google Earth to see exactly where the coordinates where it was telling me. They were about 10 miles off from where mapquest locates it to be.</p>
<p>I have searched many sites, and most give me the same coordinates as ziplist. The only ones who have gotten it right so far are the mapping websites (mapquest, maps.yahoo, etc) and <a href="http://www.xionetic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.xionetic.com</a>, but theirs isn&#8217;t a database but instead a software package.</p>
<p>After many hours of research, I found this blog and thought I would let you know not to completely trust the mentioned db, before continuing my search for a truly correct list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orange is my favorite color &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Importing Geocoded Zip Database to Postgres</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-38178</link>
		<dc:creator>Orange is my favorite color &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Importing Geocoded Zip Database to Postgres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-38178</guid>
		<description>[...] on my geocoded zip code database research, I wound up purchasing the ZipList Can-USA GeoCode database. Here&#8217;s what I did to get their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on my geocoded zip code database research, I wound up purchasing the ZipList Can-USA GeoCode database. Here&#8217;s what I did to get their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-38069</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-38069</guid>
		<description>Re-reading this today, I noticed that my &quot;by far the most expensive&quot; comment for ZipCodeWorld looks wrong because of the $39 price next to it but it&#039;s because they segment their USA/Canada databases. To recap, the one-time purchase price is $188 for both databases and $348 for a one-year subscription; a hefty $109 above the ZipList Can-USA Geocode pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-reading this today, I noticed that my &#8220;by far the most expensive&#8221; comment for ZipCodeWorld looks wrong because of the $39 price next to it but it&#8217;s because they segment their USA/Canada databases. To recap, the one-time purchase price is $188 for both databases and $348 for a one-year subscription; a hefty $109 above the ZipList Can-USA Geocode pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37737</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37737</guid>
		<description>@Zack: That&#039;s a good point too although I am leery about on-the-fly web services.  If you mix in some caching and temporary storage in there, I think you might have a winner.  In my opinion, $80 for the database is a fair price and having it locally will let me do some things with it I don&#039;t think I could do if the data was remote (run reports on large data sets/etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zack: That&#8217;s a good point too although I am leery about on-the-fly web services.  If you mix in some caching and temporary storage in there, I think you might have a winner.  In my opinion, $80 for the database is a fair price and having it locally will let me do some things with it I don&#8217;t think I could do if the data was remote (run reports on large data sets/etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Steinkamp</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37736</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Steinkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That is absolute genius on your part. Since there are 5000-something changes to the zip code data every year, it won’t solve the “keep the data updated” problem but it is certainly good enough for 90% of the applications out there. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, unless you hit the web service each time you want to do the lookup.  No local storage == data stays updated.  However, there may be implications for your app in terms of response time if the &#039;net or the service is slow.  There is also the issue of rate limits (1/sec/ip address for google, 5000/day/ip for yahoo), but since both use IP address as a key, you can circumvent the limit by assigning more than one IP per server and round-robin which one you use to make the request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That is absolute genius on your part. Since there are 5000-something changes to the zip code data every year, it won’t solve the “keep the data updated” problem but it is certainly good enough for 90% of the applications out there. </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, unless you hit the web service each time you want to do the lookup.  No local storage == data stays updated.  However, there may be implications for your app in terms of response time if the &#8216;net or the service is slow.  There is also the issue of rate limits (1/sec/ip address for google, 5000/day/ip for yahoo), but since both use IP address as a key, you can circumvent the limit by assigning more than one IP per server and round-robin which one you use to make the request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37709</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37709</guid>
		<description>@Dan - thanks, it was time well spent!

@Duncan - I had never considered using Google or Yahoo&#039;s geocoding service to reverse engineer the postal code data.  That is absolute genius on your part.  Since there are 5000-something changes to the zip code data every year, it won&#039;t solve the &quot;keep the data updated&quot; problem but it is certainly good enough for 90% of the applications out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan &#8211; thanks, it was time well spent!</p>
<p>@Duncan &#8211; I had never considered using Google or Yahoo&#8217;s geocoding service to reverse engineer the postal code data.  That is absolute genius on your part.  Since there are 5000-something changes to the zip code data every year, it won&#8217;t solve the &#8220;keep the data updated&#8221; problem but it is certainly good enough for 90% of the applications out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Loxton</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37707</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Loxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37707</guid>
		<description>This is really interesting stuff and a useful resource for geocoders in the United States. I just worked on a project for this very task down under and blogged about this very topic over at http://www.sixfive.co.uk/index.cfm/2007/3/25/Geocoding-Australian-Postcodes but with an Australian slant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting stuff and a useful resource for geocoders in the United States. I just worked on a project for this very task down under and blogged about this very topic over at <a href="http://www.sixfive.co.uk/index.cfm/2007/3/25/Geocoding-Australian-Postcodes" rel="nofollow">http://www.sixfive.co.uk/index.cfm/2007/3/25/Geocoding-Australian-Postcodes</a> but with an Australian slant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37706</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37706</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you made it back safely from your adventure. 

DW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you made it back safely from your adventure. </p>
<p>DW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan G. Switzer, II</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/comment-page-1#comment-37705</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G. Switzer, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2007/06/12/comparing-geocoded-zip-code-databases/#comment-37705</guid>
		<description>Thanks for compiling this list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for compiling this list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
