<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorting strings like numbers in PostgreSQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Possibly - every club uses it slightly differently and very few use letters at all.  I think most often it&#039;s either &quot;just because&quot; or it&#039;s some kind of class/group designation in which case the number is &quot;more important&quot;.

If this becomes the case, we could fix it by prepending &quot;999&quot; to the front of any value that begins with a letter and that would solve 99% of the cases since rarely does a number exceed 3 digits (in fact, basically never).

There are multiple other ways of grouping people in the system so using the number to do that would be inefficient at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly &#8211; every club uses it slightly differently and very few use letters at all.  I think most often it&#8217;s either &#8220;just because&#8221; or it&#8217;s some kind of class/group designation in which case the number is &#8220;more important&#8221;.</p>
<p>If this becomes the case, we could fix it by prepending &#8220;999&#8243; to the front of any value that begins with a letter and that would solve 99% of the cases since rarely does a number exceed 3 digits (in fact, basically never).</p>
<p>There are multiple other ways of grouping people in the system so using the number to do that would be inefficient at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Dintenfass</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Dintenfass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2006/06/23/sorting-strings-like-numbers-in-postgresql/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you want &quot;T50&quot; to display after the numeric values?  Or, is the &quot;T&quot; in an ID like that always non-meaningful as far as the sort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you want &#8220;T50&#8243; to display after the numeric values?  Or, is the &#8220;T&#8221; in an ID like that always non-meaningful as far as the sort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
