<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL [NOT] EXISTS Goes Zoom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/05/01/sql-not-exists-goes-zoom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/05/01/sql-not-exists-goes-zoom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/05/01/sql-not-exists-goes-zoom/#comment-47526</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghidinelli.com/2008/05/01/sql-not-exists-goes-zoom/#comment-47526</guid>
		<description>The key here is "lots of rows".  

I've sometimes found that using a NOT IN is faster when I thought it would have been slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key here is &#8220;lots of rows&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve sometimes found that using a NOT IN is faster when I thought it would have been slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
